Thomas Cox from Block.one notified the community of a change that needed to be made to Article IX of the EOS Constitution. The change names a different default arbitration forum. In fact, it is the same forum that was named for over a month, until the recent changes were made by Dan Larimer and Thomas Cox.
Josh from EOS Canada takes a moment to walk you through this change, and why you support it too.
Further reading:
https://forums.eosgo.io/discussion/1189/the-case-for-reverting-article-ix-9/p1?new=1
https://forums.eosgo.io/categories/dispute-resolution
https://github.com/EOS-Mainnet
https://github.com/EOS-Mainnet/governance/pull/15/files
Related Post:
- Ripple/XRP OFFICIALLY NAMED IN FED DOCUMENT & Named Currency NOT Security, SBI & MG Utility Pending
- Ripple XRP Mentioned in Bullish Article on Nasdaq & in Harvard Business Review Article
- “Bitcoin Price Increase Inevitable”, EOS Constitution Change And Facebook Allows Crypto Ads
- EOSRad.io #11 – EOS BlockSmith, EOS Nairobi, OracleChain, & Arbitration w/ Thomas Cox
- CRYPTO TRADING VOLUME 2X WHAT IT SEEMS? NEO FUTURE? EOS ARBITRATION? Bitcoin BCH IBM 0x Binance IMF
- EOS Arbitration ECAF Officially DEAD
- $13M of EOS STOLEN – Arbitration FAIL
- DAPP Accounts, Developing for Enterprise, On-Chain Arbitration, Regulation, + More w/ Raman Bindlish
- MacBook Air 2019 review: is it the new default?
- THIS DEFAULT SKIN IS BROKEN! – Fortnite Funny Fails and WTF Moments! #377
